There's a false positive in the output of a package (this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150785)
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file licenses_app.cpython-311.opt-1.pyc is not marked as %license See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
Interestingly, neither the other byte-code file /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/jupyterlab_server/__pycache__/licenses_app.cpython-311.pyc nor the original file /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/jupyterlab_server/licenses_app.py were included in the warning. The listed file should have not be caught by fedora-review, it's not a license file.
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/jupyterlab_server/__pycache__/licenses_app.cpython-311.pyc
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/jupyterlab_server/licenses_app.py
Also met this issue with bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150574
though the LICENSE file is a license file and should already be covered by using %{pyproject_files}
FTR I've seen the same error many times when mentioning license.png
license.png
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file license.png is not marked as %license See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
Login to comment on this ticket.