You submitted a name suggestion for the IoT Edition
Help the badges team understand what this idea is all about. If this badge is awarded for certain kinds of activities:
Submitting a proposal for the IoT Edition's name.
All community members
To help give the IoT Edition a name
Once
Submitting a proposal on the wiki page (bcotton will award the badge manually)
🤷
Metadata Update from @riecatnor: - Custom field artwork adjusted to None - Custom field concept_review_passed adjusted to None - Issue tagged with: artwork - needed, category - community, outreachy-2020
Metadata Update from @riecatnor: - Issue assigned to kavishapd
Please review the png file @riecatnor
And here is the svg file
Made some changes here.
From the discussions in other designs I guess above ones are too much crowded. I have made some further changes. Please review them @riectanor. Sorry for multiple comments😓
Here's another design
Some different backgrounds:
@riecatnor
Hi @kavishapd thanks for beginning work here! I am unsure either of these designs are bringing the concept across yet.
Let's take a look at the requirements to earn the badge: Submitting a proposal on the wiki page for Iot Edition official name. We can come up with some concepts based on that action/theme: - panda sitting at a table writing (you have this already, and I think it could work with some improvements) - Iot thematic designs (dots & lines) - panda coming up with an idea Ok, what about featuring a panda looking like it's thinking (hand on chin) and it has a thought bubble with the Iot dot/lines?? WDYT?
Side note, what you have done to the logo is against the guidelines, please take a look here, thanks! https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelines
Thanks for the review @riecatnor . Will show results asap.
Please review @riecatnor
@kavishapd cute! I like the second option (name_1) best. A couple ideas to help improve: - The stroke around the though buble should be even all around - Try giving the though bubble a white fill, and a grey stroke - I actually like the random quality of the nodes and lines in your original draft, try dropping that in :) - I think it might be nice to make the panda a bit bigger, maybe you can move it to one side and make it a bit bigger, and put the thought bubble on the other side
Thanks for your work :) I look forward to the next draft!
Something like this?? @riecatnor
I tried to get the cloud to the side.Have a look @riecatnor
@kavishapd hello, doing a great job on this. Do you mind if We work together on this?
Hi @transcendence09 its great that you want to join. But we are almost finished here. I look forward to working together on another issue soon.☺
Hi @transcendence09 its great that you want to join. But we are almost finished here. I look forward to working together on another issue soon.☺ COOL! awesome.
I spruced up @kavishapd's last submission a bit. Let me know what you think @riecatnor :)
I like it :smile:
Made some small changes, as per @riecatnor's suggestions! Tried to simplify the "nodes" and also changed their colour to dark grey from black
I like it!
@smeragoel looks amazing! Setting to approved. Thanks for your work and also to @kavishapd !
Metadata Update from @riecatnor: - Issue untagged with: artwork - needed - Issue tagged with: artwork - approved, ready to push
I pushed the images
I pushed, @bcotton can you verify it work and close it ?
@misc I can see the badge, but cannot award it.
I will take a closer look, right now, the DC maintenance is causing some trouble (error 500) so I am waiting a bit.
Mhh, so I have added again the authorization, but I realize that I do not know how people are giving the badge. Do you have a error message or anything ?
No error messages, there's just no field for doing a manual award like with other badges I have permissions to.
ah ah, so it seems that if you give the wrong email or the wrong name name for a badge, it just say "yep, I have done it", without doing it, since it doesn't check the return code of the function:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/tahrir/blob/develop/tahrir/views.py#L374
So yeah, took me a while to figure what was wrong.
So now, it should work.
Tricky! It does work now. Thanks for the help.
Metadata Update from @bcotton: - Issue close_status updated to: not yet possible - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Metadata Update from @bcotton: - Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)
Button smaller than thumb. Let's try this again
Metadata Update from @bcotton: - Issue close_status updated to: pushed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)