For more context see:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ci@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/AOBM2MQ3LHDQIYCJ5GOHV6ZIYQK7TGJU/
Metadata Update from @mvadkert: - Issue assigned to mvadkert
Metadata Update from @mvadkert: - Issue assigned to guyinger (was: mvadkert)
See also https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/167
Should we start opting-out of the rpm-sti-test job or at least mark it as non-voting in our affected packages? It has been almost 3 months and all our Zuul results are marked as failed, making it harder to spot real failures.
Hi @mvadkert do you think that could be addressed soon ? Having to make it non-voting would be like a step back on the road to only rely on testing farm for functional testing.
This also confuses casual contributors who go and investigate test failures when they don't need to: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tox/pull-request/85#comment-98272
yeah sorry for the delay
oh my, four lines for a workaround :dizzy_face:
testing: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tox/pull-request/86
I believe the problem is resolved: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tox/pull-request/86
Metadata Update from @mvadkert: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
This indeed seems to be working as expected. Thank you!
\o/