From b081c1b946322bff4f606e35e82584e808fc1947 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ♪ I'm a bot, bot, bot ♪ <_update_docs_trans@sundries01.phx2.fedoraproject.org>
Date: Feb 07 2024 22:29:46 +0000
Subject: automatic update of pot/po files


---

diff --git a/po/fr/master/pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.po b/po/fr/master/pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.po
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1d3509d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/po/fr/master/pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.po
@@ -0,0 +1,530 @@
+# SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE
+# Copyright (C) YEAR Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.
+# FIRST AUTHOR <EMAIL@ADDRESS>, YEAR.
+#
+#, fuzzy
+msgid ""
+msgstr ""
+"Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2024-02-07 22:19+0000\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
+"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
+"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
+"Language: \n"
+"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
+"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
+"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+
+#. type: Title =
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:1
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "Common Rpmlint issues"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:6
+msgid ""
+"This is a collection of information on dealing with rpmlint.  Note that the "
+"first thing you should do is use the `-e` option to rpmlint so that it "
+"provides additional explanatory text.  For example:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:10
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "rpmlint -e description-line-too-long\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:14
+#, no-wrap
+msgid ""
+"description-line-too-long:\n"
+"Your description lines must not exceed 80 characters. If a line is "
+"exceeding\n"
+"this number, cut it to fit in two lines.\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:23
+msgid ""
+"The information provided here is not exhaustive.  It covers some scenarios "
+"for which quick fixes are known.  It is also not a \"fix-all\" for every "
+"scenario and should be carefully considered within the context of building "
+"your RPM.  Some rpmlint warning should not be fixed for some packages, for "
+"example warnings about non-standard groups or users, or about setuid "
+"executables may be perfectly right for some packages.  You can see "
+"descriptions of various rpmlint issues in the files installed by package "
+"rpmlint under `/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/descriptions/`."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:26
+msgid ""
+"For more information on rpmlint project look at "
+"link:https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint[Rpmlint GitHub "
+"Project]."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:28
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "debuginfo-without-sources"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:33
+msgid ""
+"`rpmlint -e debuginfo-without-sources` provides a good overall picture.  See "
+"also xref:packaging-guidelines::index.adoc[Compiler Flags].  To fix, make "
+"sure that debugging symbols are created and that they not are stripped so "
+"they are available for rpmbuild post-processing."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:35
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "file-not-utf8"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:38
+msgid ""
+"Indicates that the text encoding of the specified file, usually a "
+"documentation file, is not in UTF8."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:41
+msgid ""
+"Usually fixed by running `iconv` on the uncompressed file before "
+"installation.  See man page *ICONV(1)*. For example, to recode a file named "
+"AUTHORS encoded in latin-1, you can use:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:45
+#, no-wrap
+msgid ""
+"iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8 AUTHORS > AUTHORS.conv && mv -f AUTHORS.conv "
+"AUTHORS\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:50
+msgid ""
+"or check the sample at the "
+"link:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/Tips#file-not-utf8[Perl] packaging "
+"tips page and "
+"link:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8[generic "
+"tricks] page."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:52
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "hardcoded-library-path"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:56
+msgid ""
+"Don't hardcode path in SPEC.  Use "
+"xref:packaging-guidelines::RPMMacros.adoc[macros] instead."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:59
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "incorrect-fsf-address"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:63
+msgid ""
+"In all cases, upstream should be informed about this.  This is the only "
+"requirement with respect to this error."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:66
+msgid ""
+"The license file, usually COPYING, must *not* be patched for legal reasons.  "
+"Other files can be patched if deemed suitable."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:69
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "incoherent-version-in-changelog"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:72
+msgid ""
+"Check the changelog entries. See also: "
+"xref:packaging-guidelines::manual-changelog.adoc[manual changelog "
+"guidelines] in the Packaging Guidelines."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:74
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "invalid-license"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:77
+msgid "The value of the License tag was not recognized."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:79
+msgid ""
+"Check xref:packaging-guidelines::LicensingGuidelines.adoc[Licensing "
+"guidelines]"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:81
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "invalid-soname"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:85
+msgid ""
+"The handling of this error depends on ld.so's load path (the \"linker "
+"path\") and whether it refers to a private or public library."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:88
+msgid ""
+"The linker path is `%{_libdir}` + any path listed in `/etc/ld.so.conf` or in "
+"a file in `/etc/ld.so.conf.d`."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:91
+msgid ""
+"Public libraries are libs expected to be used by other packages.  Other "
+"libraries e.g., plugins and functionality internal to the package are "
+"private."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:93
+msgid "We have four cases:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:97
+msgid ""
+"The library is public.  Inform upstream about the issue and propose that "
+"they add or fix versioning, possibly by sending a patch.  Don't apply the "
+"patch until it's merged upstream to avoid upgrade problems."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:99
+msgid ""
+"The library is stored outside the linker path.  In this case the error can "
+"be ignored."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:102
+msgid ""
+"The library is private and stored in a directory included in the linker "
+"path.  If possible, move the library to another directory outside the linker "
+"path.  This might require patching build scripts."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:105
+msgid ""
+"The library is private, stored in a directory included in the linker path "
+"and can't be moved.  Here, the library must have a name unlikely to clash "
+"with other libraries.  Consider filtering the Provides: to make sure the "
+"private library isn't visible."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:109
+msgid ""
+"The standard way to move a private library is to create a new directory "
+"under `%{_libdir}` e.g., `/usr/lib/myapp`.  Don't list it in "
+"`/etc/ld.so.conf` files! Instead, use a rpath to let the application locate "
+"the library."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:111 ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:147
+msgid "See also:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:113
+msgid "link:#no_soname[no-soname]"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:114
+msgid ""
+"http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-April/166104.html[thread "
+"on fedora-devel]"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:116
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "no-binary"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:119
+msgid ""
+"The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain "
+"any binaries."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:121
+msgid "Add `BuildArch: noarch` to the SPEC file"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:124
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "no-documentation"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:128
+msgid ""
+"Indicates that rpmlint could find no files marked as `%doc`. There are "
+"several instances where this is acceptable:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:132
+msgid ""
+"The package really has no documentation.  This is rare and in general quite "
+"a bad idea; every package should have some sort of documentation and should "
+"at least have the text of their license.  However, some packages have "
+"internal help systems."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:134
+msgid ""
+"All of the documentation was included in a -doc subpackage.  This would be "
+"rare as most packages should have some license text, a changelog or other "
+"information that is better placed in the main package instead of a -doc "
+"subpackage."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:136
+msgid ""
+"This is a subpackage and the relevant documentation was included in the main "
+"package.  This often happens with the -devel subpackage, but you should at "
+"least double check to ensure that any of the package's documentation which "
+"is intended for developers is included in the -devel subpackage."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:138
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "no-soname"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:143
+msgid ""
+"Indicates that the specified shared library does not have an soname "
+"(`DT_SONAME ELF` field).  If an executable is linked with a shared object "
+"which has a DT_SONAME field, when the executable is run the dynamic linker "
+"will attempt to load the shared object specified by the `DT_SONAME` field "
+"rather than the using the file name given to the linker.  See man page "
+"*LD(1)*."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:145
+msgid ""
+"See the relevant packaging guidelines at "
+"xref:packaging-guidelines::index.adoc#_downstream_so_name_versioning[Downstream "
+"soname versioning] for information on dealing with this."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:149
+msgid "link:#invalid_soname[invalid-soname]"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:151
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "private-shared-object-provides"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:155
+#, no-wrap
+msgid ""
+"W: python-dulwich.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides "
+"/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/dulwich/_objects.so "
+"_objects.so()(64bit)\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:159
+msgid ""
+"Many times this can be solved by following the procedure listed on "
+"xref:packaging-guidelines::AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering.adoc[Packaging "
+"guidelines:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering]."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:161
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "script-without-shebang"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:165
+msgid ""
+"You forgot to unset executable bits on files reported by this error.  See "
+"also: link:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Add_shebang[add "
+"shebang]."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:167
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "spurious-executable-perm"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:170
+msgid ""
+"Indicates that a file has the executable bit set while it probably should "
+"not."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:173
+msgid ""
+"Unset the executable bit, for example `chmod -x README.md` in the `%install` "
+"section of your spec file."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:175
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "standard-dir-owned-by-package"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:180
+msgid ""
+"This package owns a directory that is part of the standard hierarchy, which "
+"can lead to default directory permissions or ownerships being changed to "
+"something non-standard."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:182
+msgid "You should not make Systems standard directory's to belong to your package."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:184
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "unstripped-binary-or-object"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:187
+msgid "Make sure binaries are executable."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:189
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "unused-direct-shlib-dependency"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:193
+msgid ""
+"A binary is linked against a library but doesn't actually call any of the "
+"functions in it.  This often happens when linking against a library which "
+"uses pkgconfig; the pkgconfig file cannot know which specific functions your "
+"binary may need to call, so it tells you to link against all of the "
+"possibilities."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:196
+msgid ""
+"One fix for packages which use libtool is to put this in your `%build` "
+"section after the `%configure` call:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:200
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\\0!g' libtool\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:204
+msgid ""
+"Another fix for packages which use `%cmake` is to put this before call "
+"`%cmake`:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:208
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "export CXXFLAGS=\"%{optflags} -Wl,--as-needed\"\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:211
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:216
+msgid ""
+"The file has incorrect end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or "
+"modification on a non-Unix system.  It could prevent the file from being "
+"displayed correctly in certain circumstances.  UNIX and Linux use the "
+"Line-Feed character , whilst Windows and DOS use both a Carriage Return and "
+"Line Feed ."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:219
+msgid ""
+"Strip the Carriage Returns by using `perl` or `sed`, using `dos2unix` is not "
+"necessary. See man page *SED(1)*"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:223
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "perl -i -pe 's/\\r\\n/\\n/gs'\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:228
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "sed -i 's/\\r$//'\n"
+msgstr ""
diff --git a/pot/master/nav.pot b/pot/master/nav.pot
index 7557336..0eded0d 100644
--- a/pot/master/nav.pot
+++ b/pot/master/nav.pot
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2023-06-21 22:13+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2024-02-07 22:19+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
@@ -128,6 +128,11 @@ msgid "xref:Upstream_Release_Monitoring.adoc[Upstream Release Monitoring]"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Plain text
-#: ./nav.adoc:37
+#: ./nav.adoc:38
 msgid "xref:Utilities.adoc[Package Maintenance Utilities]"
 msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./nav.adoc:39
+msgid "xref:CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc[Common Rpmlint issues]"
+msgstr ""
diff --git a/pot/master/pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.pot b/pot/master/pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.pot
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1d3509d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pot/master/pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.pot
@@ -0,0 +1,530 @@
+# SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE
+# Copyright (C) YEAR Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.
+# FIRST AUTHOR <EMAIL@ADDRESS>, YEAR.
+#
+#, fuzzy
+msgid ""
+msgstr ""
+"Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2024-02-07 22:19+0000\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
+"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
+"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
+"Language: \n"
+"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
+"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
+"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+
+#. type: Title =
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:1
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "Common Rpmlint issues"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:6
+msgid ""
+"This is a collection of information on dealing with rpmlint.  Note that the "
+"first thing you should do is use the `-e` option to rpmlint so that it "
+"provides additional explanatory text.  For example:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:10
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "rpmlint -e description-line-too-long\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:14
+#, no-wrap
+msgid ""
+"description-line-too-long:\n"
+"Your description lines must not exceed 80 characters. If a line is "
+"exceeding\n"
+"this number, cut it to fit in two lines.\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:23
+msgid ""
+"The information provided here is not exhaustive.  It covers some scenarios "
+"for which quick fixes are known.  It is also not a \"fix-all\" for every "
+"scenario and should be carefully considered within the context of building "
+"your RPM.  Some rpmlint warning should not be fixed for some packages, for "
+"example warnings about non-standard groups or users, or about setuid "
+"executables may be perfectly right for some packages.  You can see "
+"descriptions of various rpmlint issues in the files installed by package "
+"rpmlint under `/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/descriptions/`."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:26
+msgid ""
+"For more information on rpmlint project look at "
+"link:https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint[Rpmlint GitHub "
+"Project]."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:28
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "debuginfo-without-sources"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:33
+msgid ""
+"`rpmlint -e debuginfo-without-sources` provides a good overall picture.  See "
+"also xref:packaging-guidelines::index.adoc[Compiler Flags].  To fix, make "
+"sure that debugging symbols are created and that they not are stripped so "
+"they are available for rpmbuild post-processing."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:35
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "file-not-utf8"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:38
+msgid ""
+"Indicates that the text encoding of the specified file, usually a "
+"documentation file, is not in UTF8."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:41
+msgid ""
+"Usually fixed by running `iconv` on the uncompressed file before "
+"installation.  See man page *ICONV(1)*. For example, to recode a file named "
+"AUTHORS encoded in latin-1, you can use:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:45
+#, no-wrap
+msgid ""
+"iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8 AUTHORS > AUTHORS.conv && mv -f AUTHORS.conv "
+"AUTHORS\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:50
+msgid ""
+"or check the sample at the "
+"link:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/Tips#file-not-utf8[Perl] packaging "
+"tips page and "
+"link:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8[generic "
+"tricks] page."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:52
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "hardcoded-library-path"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:56
+msgid ""
+"Don't hardcode path in SPEC.  Use "
+"xref:packaging-guidelines::RPMMacros.adoc[macros] instead."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:59
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "incorrect-fsf-address"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:63
+msgid ""
+"In all cases, upstream should be informed about this.  This is the only "
+"requirement with respect to this error."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:66
+msgid ""
+"The license file, usually COPYING, must *not* be patched for legal reasons.  "
+"Other files can be patched if deemed suitable."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:69
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "incoherent-version-in-changelog"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:72
+msgid ""
+"Check the changelog entries. See also: "
+"xref:packaging-guidelines::manual-changelog.adoc[manual changelog "
+"guidelines] in the Packaging Guidelines."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:74
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "invalid-license"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:77
+msgid "The value of the License tag was not recognized."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:79
+msgid ""
+"Check xref:packaging-guidelines::LicensingGuidelines.adoc[Licensing "
+"guidelines]"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:81
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "invalid-soname"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:85
+msgid ""
+"The handling of this error depends on ld.so's load path (the \"linker "
+"path\") and whether it refers to a private or public library."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:88
+msgid ""
+"The linker path is `%{_libdir}` + any path listed in `/etc/ld.so.conf` or in "
+"a file in `/etc/ld.so.conf.d`."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:91
+msgid ""
+"Public libraries are libs expected to be used by other packages.  Other "
+"libraries e.g., plugins and functionality internal to the package are "
+"private."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:93
+msgid "We have four cases:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:97
+msgid ""
+"The library is public.  Inform upstream about the issue and propose that "
+"they add or fix versioning, possibly by sending a patch.  Don't apply the "
+"patch until it's merged upstream to avoid upgrade problems."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:99
+msgid ""
+"The library is stored outside the linker path.  In this case the error can "
+"be ignored."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:102
+msgid ""
+"The library is private and stored in a directory included in the linker "
+"path.  If possible, move the library to another directory outside the linker "
+"path.  This might require patching build scripts."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:105
+msgid ""
+"The library is private, stored in a directory included in the linker path "
+"and can't be moved.  Here, the library must have a name unlikely to clash "
+"with other libraries.  Consider filtering the Provides: to make sure the "
+"private library isn't visible."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:109
+msgid ""
+"The standard way to move a private library is to create a new directory "
+"under `%{_libdir}` e.g., `/usr/lib/myapp`.  Don't list it in "
+"`/etc/ld.so.conf` files! Instead, use a rpath to let the application locate "
+"the library."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:111 ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:147
+msgid "See also:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:113
+msgid "link:#no_soname[no-soname]"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:114
+msgid ""
+"http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-April/166104.html[thread "
+"on fedora-devel]"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:116
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "no-binary"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:119
+msgid ""
+"The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain "
+"any binaries."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:121
+msgid "Add `BuildArch: noarch` to the SPEC file"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:124
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "no-documentation"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:128
+msgid ""
+"Indicates that rpmlint could find no files marked as `%doc`. There are "
+"several instances where this is acceptable:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:132
+msgid ""
+"The package really has no documentation.  This is rare and in general quite "
+"a bad idea; every package should have some sort of documentation and should "
+"at least have the text of their license.  However, some packages have "
+"internal help systems."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:134
+msgid ""
+"All of the documentation was included in a -doc subpackage.  This would be "
+"rare as most packages should have some license text, a changelog or other "
+"information that is better placed in the main package instead of a -doc "
+"subpackage."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:136
+msgid ""
+"This is a subpackage and the relevant documentation was included in the main "
+"package.  This often happens with the -devel subpackage, but you should at "
+"least double check to ensure that any of the package's documentation which "
+"is intended for developers is included in the -devel subpackage."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:138
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "no-soname"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:143
+msgid ""
+"Indicates that the specified shared library does not have an soname "
+"(`DT_SONAME ELF` field).  If an executable is linked with a shared object "
+"which has a DT_SONAME field, when the executable is run the dynamic linker "
+"will attempt to load the shared object specified by the `DT_SONAME` field "
+"rather than the using the file name given to the linker.  See man page "
+"*LD(1)*."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:145
+msgid ""
+"See the relevant packaging guidelines at "
+"xref:packaging-guidelines::index.adoc#_downstream_so_name_versioning[Downstream "
+"soname versioning] for information on dealing with this."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:149
+msgid "link:#invalid_soname[invalid-soname]"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:151
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "private-shared-object-provides"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:155
+#, no-wrap
+msgid ""
+"W: python-dulwich.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides "
+"/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/dulwich/_objects.so "
+"_objects.so()(64bit)\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:159
+msgid ""
+"Many times this can be solved by following the procedure listed on "
+"xref:packaging-guidelines::AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering.adoc[Packaging "
+"guidelines:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering]."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:161
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "script-without-shebang"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:165
+msgid ""
+"You forgot to unset executable bits on files reported by this error.  See "
+"also: link:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Add_shebang[add "
+"shebang]."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:167
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "spurious-executable-perm"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:170
+msgid ""
+"Indicates that a file has the executable bit set while it probably should "
+"not."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:173
+msgid ""
+"Unset the executable bit, for example `chmod -x README.md` in the `%install` "
+"section of your spec file."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:175
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "standard-dir-owned-by-package"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:180
+msgid ""
+"This package owns a directory that is part of the standard hierarchy, which "
+"can lead to default directory permissions or ownerships being changed to "
+"something non-standard."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:182
+msgid "You should not make Systems standard directory's to belong to your package."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:184
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "unstripped-binary-or-object"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:187
+msgid "Make sure binaries are executable."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:189
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "unused-direct-shlib-dependency"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:193
+msgid ""
+"A binary is linked against a library but doesn't actually call any of the "
+"functions in it.  This often happens when linking against a library which "
+"uses pkgconfig; the pkgconfig file cannot know which specific functions your "
+"binary may need to call, so it tells you to link against all of the "
+"possibilities."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:196
+msgid ""
+"One fix for packages which use libtool is to put this in your `%build` "
+"section after the `%configure` call:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:200
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\\0!g' libtool\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:204
+msgid ""
+"Another fix for packages which use `%cmake` is to put this before call "
+"`%cmake`:"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:208
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "export CXXFLAGS=\"%{optflags} -Wl,--as-needed\"\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Title ==
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:211
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:216
+msgid ""
+"The file has incorrect end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or "
+"modification on a non-Unix system.  It could prevent the file from being "
+"displayed correctly in certain circumstances.  UNIX and Linux use the "
+"Line-Feed character , whilst Windows and DOS use both a Carriage Return and "
+"Line Feed ."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Plain text
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:219
+msgid ""
+"Strip the Carriage Returns by using `perl` or `sed`, using `dos2unix` is not "
+"necessary. See man page *SED(1)*"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:223
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "perl -i -pe 's/\\r\\n/\\n/gs'\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: delimited block -
+#: ./pages/CommonRpmlintIssues.adoc:228
+#, no-wrap
+msgid "sed -i 's/\\r$//'\n"
+msgstr ""