Story Time

As a developer, I want an easy way to check whether or not a specfile is using some of rpmautospec's features so that I don't have to do it myself.

Acceptance Criteria

rpmautospec exports a new function rpmautospecEnabled or similar/better
this function checks for the existence of either %autorelease or %autochangelog
the signature should probably be something like:
-- input: a specfile, which macro to check for (default should check both)
-- output: a simple boolean
tests written
documentation added explaining the new function

Metadata Update from @nphilipp:
- Issue tagged with: F35 Change

4 years ago

nphilipp commented 4 years ago

I want to give consumers a way to say e.g. "I'm only interested in the use of %autorelease", and the function name should be PEP8 compliant, i.e. lowercase and separated by underscores. Here's how it could look like:

def specfile_uses_rpmautospec(specfile: str, check_autorelease: bool = True, check_autochangelog: bool = True) -> bool:
    ...

Metadata Update from @scoady:
- Issue assigned to scoady

4 years ago

Metadata Update from @amoloney:
- Issue set to the milestone: 0.2 (Stg Deployment)
- Issue tagged with: End User Testing

4 years ago

scoady commented 4 years ago

PR opened here: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/rpmautospec/pull-request/155

Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

4 years ago

Metadata

Assignee

scoady

Tags

Blocking

None

Depending on

None

Priority

None

Milestone

0.2 (Stg Deployment)

Boards 1

Delivery Board Status: Done

fedora-infra / rpmautospec

Source Code

#140 Export a function to check whether rpmautospec is used Closed 4 years ago by nphilipp. Opened 4 years ago by scoady.

Story Time

Acceptance Criteria

Metadata

F35 Change End User Testing

Boards 1

#140 Export a function to check whether rpmautospec is used

Closed 4 years ago by nphilipp. Opened 4 years ago by scoady.