Could we have this alias? Seems like the coprteam@f.o address doesn't work for some (perhaps good?) reasons.. Though it would be very convenient for us to have the alias working now.
We are working on the s390x support for Copr, and we need to have team access to the IBM Cloud. Though any @redhat.com address redirects to the RH's SSO page and the thing is that the team's @redhat.com proxy mail is not easy to get the SSO credentials.
@redhat.com
The coprteam@fedoraproject.org address would allow us to register to the IBM Cloud via password.
Sure. Do you all have a account system group? if not, perhaps we could make a group and point the alias to it? that would allow you to add or remove people without needing to tweak aliases or anything.
ie, make a coprteam account group and an alias of:
coprteam: coprteam-members@fedoraproject.org
Thoughts?
Metadata Update from @humaton: - Issue priority set to: Waiting on Reporter (was: Needs Review) - Issue tagged with: low-gain, low-trouble, ops
We already have the group management implemented on our side, so it's not necessary to have FAS group. At least as long as it is not necessary for you to set this.
We just need coprteam@fedoraproject.org => copr-team@redhat.com alias. I actually thought that this is the default f.o behavior (e.g. that praiskup@f.o is redirected to praiskup@redhat.com for my nic, because my mail in FAS is @redhat.com).
coprteam@fedoraproject.org
copr-team@redhat.com
OTOH, as long as the bugzilla.redhat.com default assignee continues working, I think we are just fine to migrate the coprteam user account to proper group. I would let this on you to decide what is easier.
coprteam
Also, thinking again ...
We already have aws-copr exactly for this purpose (accessing cloud). Do you think it would be appropriate to have ibmcloud-copr group, with a dedicated e-mail address in @fedoraproject.org?
aws-copr
ibmcloud-copr
Lets not overthink it? I added the alias for: coprteam@fedoraproject.org => copr-team@redhat.com
Would ibmcloud be something that authenticates against? or ? Anyhow, please re-open if you want anything further.
Metadata Update from @kevin: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Thank you!
Would ibmcloud be something that authenticates against?
Yes, but it's not so sophisticated as in the case of AWS where we use fine-grained FAS groups (while logging in as normal users). With ibmcloud we'll have just a group-level credential. We need to figure out how to deal with this long-term - to give the appropriate users access without handing-over passwords. But I suppose this will need time and close IBM and Fedora cooperation.
Log in to comment on this ticket.