#11895 New "pkgdb" group: coreos-sig
Closed: Fixed with Explanation 10 months ago by kevin. Opened 11 months ago by siosm.

NOTE

Describe what you would like us to do:


Create a group coreos-sig to use for regrouping access to packages maintained by the CoreOS team in Fedora.

According to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/howtos/groups_in_fedora/#_how_to_request_a_group_to_be_created, this would be a pkgdb group.

Unless it's strictly needed, we don't need a new mailing list.

See: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1631

When do you need this to be done by? (YYYY/MM/DD)


No specific deadline.

Thanks!


Metadata Update from @phsmoura:
- Issue priority set to: Waiting on Assignee (was: Needs Review)
- Issue tagged with: low-gain, low-trouble, ops

11 months ago

package groups have to have a private list associated with them... this list gets all the bugs for packages that group manages and could get security bugs, so it needs to be private.

Is that acceptable?

Metadata Update from @kevin:
- Issue assigned to kevin

10 months ago

Sorry for the delay here, this dropped off my radar. :(

I have:

setup a coreos-sig group in fas with you as a member and manager.
setup a private coreos-sig list with you as owner.
added the coreos-sig group to src.fedoraproject.org.

You now need to create a bugzilla.redhat.com account: coreos-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
It should send the activation to the list, but hit moderation and let you use that to finish setting up the account.
This is needed to allow the sig to get bugs cc'ed/assigned.

Let us know if you need anything further or have any questions or issues.

Metadata Update from @kevin:
- Issue close_status updated to: Fixed with Explanation
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

10 months ago

Log in to comment on this ticket.

Metadata
Boards 1
ops Status: Backlog