cc: @abompard

For the record, that's https://mirrormanager.fedoraproject.org/host/1174.
I looked at their data in MirrorManager, and indeed their Fedora mirror is not available, but their EPEL mirror is working. As a result the host does not get disabled, since enabling/disabling is a host-level thing.

Maybe we could make that a category-level thing? What do you think @adrian ? (or am I missing something?)

In the meantime, can you reply to Bytemark and ask them to remove their "Fedora Linux" category in MirrorManager at https://mirrormanager.fedoraproject.org/host/1174 ?
I could do it but it's always better if it's the actual mirror owner that does this sort of thing. In case they forgot, their FAS username is bytemarkmirrors (or patch0)

I sent a follow-up email as you suggested @abompard , I received no reply but the "Fedora Linux" category is now functional again, so maybe the right person saw it this time.

But on a wider point, disabling hosts based on a category-level does seem sensible.

@triatic might you file a upstream ticket on mirrormanager to add that?

https://github.com/fedora-infra/mirrormanager2/issues/new/choose

or if you prefer, I or @abompard can

Sure, go ahead! I'm pretty new to Fedora so I'm sure you could word the feature request better than me.

Filed: https://github.com/fedora-infra/mirrormanager2/issues/376

This Fedora mirror continues to randomly be unavailable, it is currently unavailable at the time of writing. EPEL is always available, but Fedora keeps disappearing.

Attempts to contact Bytemark to resolve have been unsuccessful.

Can someone remove Fedora for this mirror please?

I disabled the mirror. It seems like the content has not been update for over a year and the Fedora category is completely missing.

So, I guess there's not much we can do until they respond/fix things, and in the mean time they are disabled...
So, I going to close this now. If there's more we can do here feel free to reopen.