Hi, we have mainly a group: fedora-ci-admins To be consistent, can I ask to create a new group with name: fedora-ci-admins-vault-osci ? If no, I will set fedora-ci-admins that defines access rights. Thank you!
fedora-ci-admins
fedora-ci-admins-vault-osci
That is too long a name for a lot of services (I have found 20-24 seems to break things).
What kind of group are you wanting (and where?) and is a name like "fca-vault-osci" exceptable?
Metadata Update from @smooge: - Issue priority set to: Waiting on Reporter (was: Needs Review) - Issue tagged with: authentication, low-gain, low-trouble, ops
Hi! If possible could we please go with: ci-vault-osci? Thank you!
ci-vault-osci
I still need other questions answered.. are you meaning a FAS group or some other group in a different service. What kind of group? One for git or one for tracking or some other type? (Is it to be similar to the one you listed originally or a differnet sort?)
I am sorry, I am missed question. Yes, please create a FAS group. This FAS group to limit access to secrets in vault for ci projects for osci team. Some kind of ACL, it will be used only in: https://vault.ci.fedoraproject.org/ no where else. Thank you.
Metadata Update from @smooge: - Issue assigned to smooge
Hi the group ci-vault-osci has been created and you have been made the administrator of it.
Metadata Update from @smooge: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Thank you for prompt support.
Log in to comment on this ticket.