@carlwgeorge reported on matrix that https://pagure.io/fedora-join/Welcome-to-Fedora was not found. I'm not sure what to do about it, but I'm opening this issue hoping that it gains someone's attention who might be in a better position to help.
I'm not sure when exactly it went 404, but Carl's message to us on matrix was at 17:08 CDT, and I took a look at 19:19 CDT on 12 June 2024.
The most recent email notification I got from an issue in that repository was today at 10:00 CDT.
https://pagure.io/fedora-join/Welcome-to-Fedora/issue/358
I'm assuming at the time that link worked, but it's been a 404 since at least 17:00 CDT.
Hrm, yeh, the project has completely disappeared!
https://pagure.io/projects/fedora-join/%2A
I'm assuming this is some sort of infra glitch (unless someone deleted the repo (?!)).
Filed: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11983
So, someone has deleted the repo:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11983
I assume they were trying to stop getting notifications and have ended up deleting it. It's clearly an edge case, so I don't know if we need to tweak things:
So (and I'd rather not, but), do we need to create a new group for newcomers that has fewer permissions to avoid such honest mistakes?
(I've removed the account that deleted the repo from our group for the moment)
Thoughts?
I think we should make a group with an appropriate balance of permissions so that people can manage their tickets. We want people to feel included, but we also have a legitimate need to protect things like the projects themselves so that we can avoid situations like this one.
In my mind it's not a whole lot different than how the infra folks run things. I'm new here, so they have me set up with a fairly basic set of read-only permissions and access to a limited scope of systems while I'm in the fi-apprentice group. Later as I learn more and folks get comfortable with me they might give me broader permissions as they need to. (Or they might decide something completely different, and I'd respect their decision.)
I don't feel like that makes us exclusive or unwelcoming, but rather it shows that we're trying to take reasonable measures to be good stewards of our resources.
Yeh, I agree. So:
fedora-join-admins
fedora-join
We're waiting to see if the repo/project can be recovered. I do have a fork, probably outdated, but forks don't have copies of tickets :(
That's really weird=2E Maybe it was a mistake but all these organizations = have sabotage and vandalism attacks, GDG Google developers group is no diff= erent=20
On June 13, 2024 9:07:15 AM EDT, Paul Maconi pagure@pagure=2Eio wrote:
aggraxis added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I think we should make a group with an appropriate balance of permissions= so that people can manage their tickets=2E We want people to feel included= , but we also have a legitimate need to protect things like the projects th= emselves so that we can avoid situations like this one=2E=20 In my mind it's not a whole lot different than how the infra folks run th= ings=2E I'm new here, so they have me set up with a fairly basic set of rea= d-only permissions and access to a limited scope of systems while I'm in th= e fi-apprentice group=2E Later as I learn more and folks get comfortable wi= th me they might give me broader permissions as they need to=2E (Or they mi= ght decide something completely different, and I'd respect their decision= =2E) I don't feel like that makes us exclusive or unwelcoming, but rather it s= hows that we're trying to take reasonable measures to be good stewards of o= ur resources=2E `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure=2Eio/fedora-join/Fedora-Join/issue/293
aggraxis added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I think we should make a group with an appropriate balance of permissions= so that people can manage their tickets=2E We want people to feel included= , but we also have a legitimate need to protect things like the projects th= emselves so that we can avoid situations like this one=2E=20
In my mind it's not a whole lot different than how the infra folks run th= ings=2E I'm new here, so they have me set up with a fairly basic set of rea= d-only permissions and access to a limited scope of systems while I'm in th= e fi-apprentice group=2E Later as I learn more and folks get comfortable wi= th me they might give me broader permissions as they need to=2E (Or they mi= ght decide something completely different, and I'd respect their decision= =2E)
I don't feel like that makes us exclusive or unwelcoming, but rather it s= hows that we're trying to take reasonable measures to be good stewards of o= ur resources=2E ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure=2Eio/fedora-join/Fedora-Join/issue/293
Yeh, this was clearly an honest mistake. Stuff happens :)
Anyway, here's what I think we should do to get our process back on track:
How does that sound?
A new repo is here now:
https://pagure.io/fedora-join/WelcomeToFedora
Let's open new tickets!
@ankursinha With everything seemingly back in order I think we can mark this issue as resolved right? Just doing a bit of yard work/cleaning up a little.
Yeh, closing this. We'll use the new repo and if the old one is restored at some point, we'll see how to proceed.
Metadata Update from @ankursinha: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
This ticket has been migrated to the forgejo instance. Please find the new ticket here https://forge.fedoraproject.org/join/Fedora-Join//issues/293