= problem =
During Fedora 13, a small amount was available to reward several key QA contributors for their efforts.
= analysis =
If possible, I'd like to repeat this in Fedora 14.
= enhancement recommendation =
What's the best way to say thanks?
This is a large task ... and I haven't done a great job of actively updating this ticket with progress. The bad news is that I don't have tons of time to develop scripts and automation to support this task. The good news though, is that there are some rough tools to get a basic idea.
My current understanding of the Fedora QA metrics landscape is listed below. Anyone is welcome to grab a topic and expand/correct as needed.
Replying to [comment:1 jlaska]:
'''Lists''' - The [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EKG EKG] project is pretty straight forward. It scrubs the mailing lists and provides information on the list contributors. I'd love to adjust this a bit, first into something I'm more comfortable with (python), and second to adjust the output slightly. Perhaps listing top 15 contributors, then top 15 contributor domains. Finally, maybe also listing top 15 most active threads? Anyone interested in helping? * Next steps ... adjust the EKG reporting to break down the contributors according to the criteria above.
This is closely related to the work jtluka has done as part of our [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kparal/Idea:Fedora_Hall_of_Fame fhof] project. His script uses EKG to parse interesting data out of the mailing lists. It is currently available at [http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=fedoracommunity.git;a=tree;f=collectors;h=e9cee392e1a6350b0e3d4c8d05539ccfab555dfc;hb=e96fee71196337d7964c0d29856e09290c928d42 fedoracommunity git].
This is pretty dead now, as it was specific to the F14 release. The topic of rewarding contributors comes up quite often, but I don't think there's a lot of value in keeping this specific ticket open.
Log in to comment on this ticket.