Consider adding brave as a 3rd party repos brave is a opensource browser app with a good support and privacy respecting behavior. the browser and all patches are with MPL-2.0 license and project in github https://github.com/brave/brave-browser https://github.com/brave/brave-core https://github.com/brave/brave-ui there repo https://brave.com/linux/#release-channel-installation we already have chrome which is not opensource so it should be added https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/workstation-working-group/third-party-repos/ as we means fedora aims for opensource https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/
As long as this repo contains appstream metadata, I don't see why not. But does it?
If it looks good in GNOME Software, then we can do it.
Can you please take a screenshot of what you see in GNOME Software after adding this repo and searching for Brave?
They don't have AppStream repodata files. Both the x86_64 repo and the AArch64 repo lack appstream.xml.gz and appstream-icons.tar.gz files in the repomd.xml index file.
appstream.xml.gz
appstream-icons.tar.gz
repomd.xml
I've filed a report with Brave as gh#brave/brave-browser#27817.
OK, thanks.
I'll reject this request for now. Feel free to reopen when https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/27817 is fixed.
Metadata Update from @catanzaro: - Issue close_status updated to: Won't fix - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Log in to comment on this ticket.