Signed-off-by: Ondrej Nosek onosek@redhat.com
@mohanboddu FYI. I was probably typo in the first version of the pull-request. From the context of the discussion we assume, that epel\d+-playground should be requested only for epel8 and newer branches.
Yup, now the code and comment match. :thumbsup:
Pull-Request has been merged by onosek
@onosek yeah, thanks for the fix.
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Nosek onosek@redhat.com