From 293d9d121ec85f156c7865ed619e1fa47f9fef64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Miller Date: Nov 09 2021 16:35:24 +0000 Subject: gender neutral language. --- diff --git a/fesco/modules/ROOT/pages/Who_is_allowed_to_modify_which_packages.adoc b/fesco/modules/ROOT/pages/Who_is_allowed_to_modify_which_packages.adoc index f3cff59..9b69d5d 100644 --- a/fesco/modules/ROOT/pages/Who_is_allowed_to_modify_which_packages.adoc +++ b/fesco/modules/ROOT/pages/Who_is_allowed_to_modify_which_packages.adoc @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ because they are neutral and trackable; but poking people once or twice in IRC or directly via mail might be a good idea. But there are certain exceptions -where the maintainer has to accept that other packagers will modify his packages. +where maintainers need to accept that other packagers will modify the packages they are responsible for. Those exceptions are described in detail below. They mostly boil down to this: In any of the following cases, the xref:Provenpackager_policy.adoc[provenpackagers] are allowed to fix stuff in other peoples packages: @@ -51,12 +51,13 @@ how to lay out the above rules. [[unhandled_issues]] === Unhandled issues -The packager normally should keep track of his packages. That means: +Packagers should keep track of the packages for which which they are responsible. +That means: * respond in bugs reported in bugzilla, especially fast if it's a serious problem like a security issue -* fix his stuff without explicit poking +* fix issues without explicit poking if it is mentioned in the problem reports somewhere -- that includes: