Hello @ellio167,
during our periodic check as per the "Inactive packagers policy" we detected no activity from you as a packager, nor in other Fedora community places, like Bodhi or mailing lists.
In order to reduce security risks from possible accounts hijacking we're trying to contact you to know if you're still reachable and if your email set in Fedora Account System (relliott@umn.edu) is still valid.
Please, let us know if you're still intersted in participating in Fedora and if you still need your account to be listed in the packager group.
packager
Without any reply from you, in two months we will proceed to remove your account from the packager group. Your account will still be active.
Hello,
Yes, I'm still active and would like to retain my account in the "packager" group for the time being.
Thank you.
Ryan Elliott
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022, Ben Cotton wrote:
bcotton reported a new issue against the project: find-inactive-packagers that you are following: `` Hello @ellio167, during our periodic check as per the "Inactive packagers policy" we detected no activity from you as a packager, nor in other Fedora community places, like Bodhi or mailing lists. In order to reduce security risks from possible accounts hijacking we're trying to contact you to know if you're still reachable and if your email set in Fedora Account System (relliott@umn.edu) is still valid. Please, let us know if you're still intersted in participating in Fedora and if you still need your account to be listed in the packager group. Without any reply from you, in two months we will proceed to remove your account from the packager group. Your account will still be active. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/491
bcotton reported a new issue against the project: find-inactive-packagers that you are following: `` Hello @ellio167,
find-inactive-packagers
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/491
-- Ryan S. Elliott, Ph.D. Professor & Director of Graduate Studies Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota (612) 624-2376 (626-1558 fax) https://z.umn.edu/relliott download vCard https://z.umn.edu/relliott_vcf OpenPGP Public key https://z.umn.edu/relliott_asc (576D4997C4D51D92)
Symmetries abound in nature, in technology, and --- especially --- in the simplified mathematical models that we study so assiduously. Symmetries complicate things and simplify them. They complicate them by introducing exceptional types of behavior, increasing the number of variables involved, and making vanish things that usually do not vanish. They simplify them by introducing exceptional types of behavior, increasing the number of variables involved, and making vanish things that usually do not vanish. They violate all the hypotheses of our favourite theorems, yet lead to natural generalizations of those theorems. It is now standard to study the 'generic' behavior of dynamical systems. Symmetry is not generic. The answer is to work within the world of symmetric systems and to examine a suitably restricted idea of genericity.
Ian Stewart, 1988
Ack, thanks!
Metadata Update from @bcotton: - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)