Signed-off-by: Valerij Maljulin vmaljuli@redhat.com
can you add more info here? Especially about the fact that this is supported for remote rules now.
Remove "Backward compatibility keeped" it seems redundant.
Missing comma: "field, other rules"
It would be clearer to mention that missing SCM info is not a failure (unless RemoteRule {required: true} is used).
RemoteRule {required: true}
rebased onto ac601241052b8069ba175ef50457effad8cd6264
rebased onto 736470b632f4340ad949c9411c4a2c852754337c
+1
Pull-Request has been merged by gnaponie
Signed-off-by: Valerij Maljulin vmaljuli@redhat.com