To save folks some time:

My new packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=closed&bug_status=open&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cstatus%2Csummary%2Clast_change_time%2Cseverity%2Cpriority&component=Package%20Review&email1=jonathan%40almalinux.org&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=equals&list_id=13010954&order=priority%2C%20severity%2C%20&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced

My reviews: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=open&bug_status=closed&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cstatus%2Csummary%2Clast_change_time%2Cseverity%2Cpriority&component=Package%20Review&email1=jonathan%40almalinux.org&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=equals&list_id=13010957&order=priority%2C%20severity%2C%20&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced

While the work is impressive, we have one rule in
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Packager_sponsor_policy/#who_sponsors_the_sponsors

The rule is:
Have been members of the packager group for at least one release cycle so that they have seen the process of branching for a new release.

While you technically have seen the branching process. It has not been 6 months since you become packager.
Therefore I am for -1, but I hope you will really in the second half of January. Then I will definitely vote for you.

While the list of your package reviews contains lots of trivial reviews (which does not count) I made the list of non-trivial review to ease others the review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121595
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121593
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117772
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107818
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116217

While the work is impressive, we have one rule in
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Packager_sponsor_policy/#who_sponsors_the_sponsors

The rule is:
Have been members of the packager group for at least one release cycle so that they have seen the process of branching for a new release.

While you technically have seen the branching process. It has not been 6 months since you become packager.
Therefore I am for -1, but I hope you will really in the second half of January. Then I will definitely vote for you.

I was under the impression the release cycle was the important part, and the "(generally 6 months)" part at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Sponsor_a_New_Contributor/#becoming_a_fedora_package_collection_sponsor was only in reference to how long release cycles generally are.

The doc you linked and the one I linked seem to slightly conflict on the time implication.

It's been a few more months. Would anyone care to vote now or @jonathanspw would you care to add anything or resubmit later?

+1 from me.

I'd like to proceed. I was waiting until the 14th to bump this since it's technically the 6 month mark.

I'm currently working on what I think is a non-trivial review in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157646 for whatever that's worth.

Would love for everyone to vote :)

+1 from me

+1

I've worked with @jonathanspw with the certbot packages

I am +1 to this request.

+1 from me now

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

I see now +11 and no -1s, so this is accepted. ;)

Use your powers wisely!