packager-sponsors

#707 Request Sponsorship for mkdotenv
Opened by pc-magas. Modified

Open
Close Issue

Hello,
My name is Dimitrios Desyllas, and I am seeking for a package sponsor for a small utility I develop upon: https://github.com/pc-magas/mkdotenv

I am not too familiar with the process and I followed the steps as seen upon: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/New_Package_Process_for_New_Contributors/

I already release rpms for fedrora 41: https://github.com/pc-magas/mkdotenv/releases/tag/v0.1.7

My goal is for this small utility to be part of fedora packages.

@pc-magas
Was wondering, did you ever get a sponsor?
I'm requestion a sponsor as well, but no luck finding one.

NO I have not found a sponsor.

Hello community,
I currently have releases newer version since 0.1.7:

https://github.com/pc-magas/mkdotenv/releases/tag/v0.3.1

Maybe I missed it, but where is the package review ticket? The process starts with a submitted package; jumping directly to sponsorship is skipping a fundamental piece of the process. Either a sponsor will do the package review or the interactions that happen as part of the package review will be useful information for the prospective sponsors.

I suggest you read the packaging guidelines.
Your current spec file would fail on many points, I certainly wouldn't sponsor you until you learn the basics.

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pc-magas/mkdotenv/refs/heads/master/rpmbuild/SPECS/mkdotenv.spec

Please submit your Bugzilla new package request as out lined in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/New_Package_Process_for_New_Contributors/. There is an automated Fedora review that will show many of your obvious mistakes. Correct them, resubmit and then ask for manual review

Metadata
None
None
None
None
None
Static archive. pagure.io was sunset in 2026; this is a read-only snapshot.
Red Hat Logo

Fedora is sponsored by Red Hat. Learn more about the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora »

© Red Hat, Inc. and others.