Hi sponsors,

I would like to gently follow up on this sponsorship request.

My hwatch package review has already received fedora-review+:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2463848

During the review, I addressed the issues pointed out by the reviewer / Fedora Review Service, updated the package accordingly, and confirmed that the review build succeeds.

I understand that sponsorship is not only about getting one package approved, but also about demonstrating understanding of Fedora packaging guidelines and processes.

To make this easier to evaluate, I am willing to do informal reviews or review swaps for other packages, especially Rust / CLI / terminal-related packages.

If there are specific things I should do before sponsorship, I would appreciate your guidance.

Thank you.

Welcome to Fedora!

I left some feedback on the review request from a Rust packaging perspective.

Thank you, and thanks for the welcome!

I saw your feedback on the review request from the Rust packaging perspective. I will rework the spec file based on your comments and upload the revised Spec and SRPM to the review request.

I appreciate your guidance.

I see that the review is proceeding.

In the meantime, standard questions. Have you read
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines and
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy ?

Please do two reviews of packages under
https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/reviewable.html.
(Don't pick any of the very complex ones.)

Thank you.

In the meantime, standard questions. Have you read
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines and
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy ?

I haven't read it properly yet, so I'll read it now.

Please do two reviews of packages under
https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/reviewable.html.
(Don't pick any of the very complex ones.)

Okay, I will try two reviews of packages.

NOTE: I update when add review.

• https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2488279#c1
• https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2488330#c2