Fixes #2438
Signed-off-by: Clement Verna cverna@tutanota.com
Do we want to keep the multiple remote approach as another way?
I dunno the multi remote approach does not seems as convenient and does not bring anything more.
I think having only 1 approach in the docs makes it clear to the user on how he is suppose to do it.
Okido, let's rebase and merge then :)
rebased
Rebased ;)
Pull-Request has been merged by pingou
I didn't see this get started - and if we don't want to amend it again that is cool too.
I use this little bash function to pull PRs now. I am wondering if this should be worked in as another option for people who don't want all PRs showing up all the time in their branch list:
function pullpr { remote="${2:-upstream}" git fetch $remote pull/$1/head:pr_$1 git checkout pr_$1 }
Fixes #2438
Signed-off-by: Clement Verna cverna@tutanota.com