The jpegxl-0.6.1-1.fc36 bumps the libjxl.so soname and needs proper coodination for rebuilding its consumers. This is causing many packages to fail building, as the jpegxl package is part of the depency cycle of the doxygen package.
jpegxl-0.6.1-1.fc36
libjxl.so
Package resolution failed Problem: package gd-2.3.3-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libavif.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package graphviz-2.49.3-2.fc36.x86_64 requires libgd.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package libavif-0.9.2-2.fc35.x86_64 requires libaom.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides libjxl.so.0()(64bit) needed by libaom-3.1.2-1.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libjxl.so.0(JXL_0)(64bit) needed by libaom-3.1.2-1.fc35.x86_64 Problem: package graphviz-2.49.3-2.fc36.x86_64 requires libgd.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gd-2.3.3-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libavif.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package doxygen-2:1.9.1-12.fc36.x86_64 requires graphviz, but none of the providers can be installed - package libavif-0.9.2-2.fc35.x86_64 requires libaom.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides libjxl.so.0()(64bit) needed by libaom-3.1.2-1.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libjxl.so.0(JXL_0)(64bit) needed by libaom-3.1.2-1.fc35.x86_64
Untagged.
Metadata Update from @kevin: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Thank you!