We had a word about this in the mindshare meeting on 2018-07-16 and I am sorted for now

What was the outcome? I was unable to make the meeting and didn't see the minutes posted to the mailing list.

Per the meeting: https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-07-16/fedora_mindshare.2018-07-16-12.35.log.txt

12:56:37 <bexelbie> #topic #28 [FAmA] APAC needs one
12:56:38 <bexelbie> #link https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/28
12:56:46 <bexelbie> sumantro, can you expand on this? nb can you comment on this?
12:56:58 <nb> I don't think there has to be FAMA from every region
12:57:13 <nb> FAMA is meant to serve all the regions, not to be region-specific
12:58:03 <bexelbie> sumantro, is there service we need in APAC we aren't getting (keeping #26 in mind)
12:58:15 <sumantro> so I heard Sirko was FAMA once.. I had a notion that it was for all regions as the picture kinda explained that treasurer,bookeeper and storyteller will report to FAMA, I was under the impression there will be one for each region
12:58:27 <nb> sumantro, I do not believe sirko was ever fama
12:58:55 <nb> FAMA has historically been 1 person
12:59:03 <nb> recently it got made into me+robyduck
12:59:06 <nb> as I understand it
12:59:18 <bexelbie> so thinking about this from a moving forward perspective, do we have a need that is going unfilled?
12:59:27 <bexelbie> Do we need to modify FAMA to get what we need done today done?
13:00:26 * nb does not think so, but is interested to hear from sumantro
13:00:35 <sumantro> bex, while drafting the Amby process, I wanted to understand How will the advocates raise a request for money and if FAMA is handling then how will that work.
13:00:57 <bexelbie> sumantro, the advocates would open a ticket with mindshare, not fama
13:01:13 <bexelbie> fama is, aiui, an administrative body that handles memberships in groups and activity monitoring
13:01:51 <sumantro> no, who will administer the budget? mindshare or FAMA in a case where advocates raise the request?
13:01:58 <nb> sumantro, mindshare
13:02:18 <sumantro> nb thanks, got it.
13:02:48 <bexelbie> sumantro, what action should we take with this ticket?
13:03:01 <sumantro> and if an ex-amby wants to join back, will they raise the request to FAMA or mindshare?
13:03:09 <nb> sumantro, FAMA
13:03:13 <nb> FAMA handles membership
13:03:42 <sumantro> bex you can close that one. I am all sorted here. :)
13:03:45 <sumantro> nb thanks :)
13:04:36 <bexelbie> sumantro, you mind closing with a note about what we talked about here for posterity?
13:05:03 <sumantro> bex doing it right away!

This is closed.

This was new to me:

13:03:01 <sumantro> and if an ex-amby wants to join back, will they raise the request to FAMA or mindshare?
13:03:09 <nb> sumantro, FAMA

This is the type of information we should include for mindshare#25.